How are you doing? I hope everything's fine for you. Life is good right now as far as I am concerned, I have been quite busy lately and I have been enjoying every bit of it. Too many professional responsibilities and too much work that I have to get done, so it goes without saying that my time is limited. This is basically why I haven't posted another part of this Introduction to Cartography series in the last two weeks, but I am back to make it up to you today. I don't mean to waste your time though, so let's do this!
As promised in a previous Cartography post regarding the fundamental elements of Dasymetric mapping, this time we are going to move on to our next topic and talk about the various data visualization methods followed in order to achieve precise depiction of the natural terrestrial surface and its characteristics. In order to be able to use and present all available information efficiently, I have decided that this particular topic will be addressed in three different parts. Today we will talk about 3D Diagrams and Schematic Maps, which are two different types of Perspective Maps. Bear with me.
This paragraph is a personal note for all of you who are new to this blog; Introduction to Cartography is just an introductory series about Cartography, which is the art and science of creating precise 2D depictions of our 3D world. This means that I am sharing technical information that I gathered through years of research in a simplified manner, so that we can have some fun while learning something useful! There's always a high chance of learning a thing or two by reading through the parts of this series, so stay tuned!
Nature & Problems
The creation of accurate depictions of the natural terrestrial surface hasalways been a rather significant issue for Engineers. The availability of quality depictions enables us to study this natural, continuous phenomenon which impacts us in all aspects of our daily routine. This is basically the primary reason why a higher level of precision is demanded when it comes to creating maps that depict the shape of the natural terrestrial surface. The need for higher quality standards is what keeps Cartographers in pursuit of the most efficient methods of creating precise depictions of the shape of the Earth, however constant development provided solutions which in return created more problems and fueled the need for further research. Let's see how.
The main problem consists in the differences regarding precision between the different techniques used. The development of various different techniques and methods gave birth to some interesting conflicts. For instance, the most efficient techniques of visual representation cannot be used for the extraction of quality topographic information and vice versa, giving Cartographers some food for thought and inducing the need for the development of ways to handle those conflicting constraints. As we will see, the solution lies in the creation of various data visualization methods, which are tools that serve the purpose of combining visual and metric precision.
There are fundamental differences between the various types of data visualization methods, depending on the type and the purpose of each tool. The availability of technological equipment and computers in combination with the fact that vast amounts of technical information are produced annually led to the development of powerful tools of iconographic mapping. Today we are going to take a deeper look at two different tools of data visualization that belong in the category of perspective maps. Let's start with 3D Diagrams.
The development of methods of depicting the shape of the natural terrestrial surface with precision was a rather significant issue during the 19th century. Cartographers achieved to provide solutions for this problem with the utilization of the theories of perspective geometry, which gave birth to the creation of 3D Diagrams. Those 3D maps were first used by Geologists as they enabled them to create 3D models which made it easier to analyze geological phenomena and comprehend their nature and magnitude. Cross sections were later included with upper edges that represent trasnversal sections of the model's surface; this enabled Cartographers to create visual representations of the structural relations between rock formations situated beneath the surface. Win - win.
3D Diagrams are meant to provide observers with a view of a particular section of the Earth's Crust with known dimensions. What makes 3D Diagrams so special is the fact that they can be used to represent a wide variety of information, ranging from structural to purely metric data and allowing 3D navigation beneath the model's surface. These diagrams are produced easily with the utilization of plotters nowadays, which is a process that doesn't cost much. It is also worth noting that 3D Diagrams are used by Cartographers in order to create depictions of small parts of the Earth's surface and therefore the planet's curvature is not taken into consideration at all. The Earth is NOT FLAT by the way.
Schematic maps are tools that utilize symbolic iconography in order to achieve precise depiction of the natural terrestrial surface. The primary objective is to create an efficient representation of the correlation between the shape of the natural terrestrial surface and its geological and geomorphological characteristics. This is something that can be achieved with the utilization of intensity as a primary visual variable in physiographic diagrams, however the utilization of other visual variables as well is a common phenomenon in the creation of this sort of schematic maps. Land type maps belong to the same category and are mainly used in cases when the main point of interest is the extraction of information regarding the correlations between gound formations.
Physiographic diagrams and land type maps bear significant similarities and both come with an important disadvantage; there is no satisfactory accuracy regarding the 2D placement of spatial elements. This is due to the fact that any side faces of a 3D object that is observed from a side view appear to be in the wrong position on the horizontal plane. This is a problem that we have been aware of for decades and thankfully with the technological development of our times we can create digital 3D models that enable us to change view angle accordingly and focus on the spatial elements of interest.
Alright everyone, that's it for today. Another part of my Introduction to Cartography series has come to an end. I got a lot more information to share with you, so make sure to follow me for more. If you do have any questions regarding anything you read here, please do let me know in the comments section below and I will do my best to provide prompt and detailed answers. More Engineering stuff regarding Cartography and Geology coming out within the next days, so stay tuned and follow me for more!
PREVIOUS PARTS OF THE SERIES:
- INTRODUCTION TO CARTOGRAPHY
- CLASSIFICATION & BROAD CATEGORIES
- CARTOGRAPHIC TRANSFORMATIONS
- CONFORMAL PROJECTIONS
- EQUAL AREA PROJECTIONS
- AZIMUTHAL PROJECTIONS
- SCALE FACTOR & TRANSFORMATION
- CARTESIAN COORDINATES & GRID SYSTEMS
- 3D COLOR SPACE
- COLOR SYSTEMS
- COLOR & PATTERN IN SYMBOLIZATION (Part I)
- COLOR & PATTERN IN SYMBOLIZATION (Part II)
- CARTOGRAPHIC SYMBOLIZATION & VISUAL VARIABLES
- SYMBOLIZING POINT DATA
- SYMBOLIZING LINEAR DATA
- SYMBOLIZING SURFACE DATA
- SYMBOLIZING VOLUMETRIC DATA
- STATISTICAL SURFACE & POINT SYMBOLS
- STATISTICAL SURFACE & LINEAR SYMBOLS
- ISARITHMIC MAPPING
- ELEMENTS OF ISARITHMIC MAPPING
- ISARITHMIC ANALYSIS
- CHOROPLETH MAPPING
- ELEMENTS OF CHOROPLETH MAPPING
- DASYMETRIC MAPPING
University Textbooks & Course Lectures:
- Χαρτογραφία Ι/ Cartography I -TSOULOS(National Technical University of Athens, School of Rural & Surveying Engineering, Course Lecture Notes)