Re: Darthknight

Several users informed me that @darthknight has posted My Steem funds are currently being frozen by the top 20 Steem witnesses (reward for info)

In particular, @guiltyparties asked me on a discord channel to take a look at the issue and we have discussed it with other users (including @dr-frankenstein). I told him that I would try to fix this issue soon - and this posting summarize my thoughts for now.

The following is an open letter to @darthknight. Note that this is a gesture of goodwill, not legal opinion or advice.

Dear darthknight,

Great to see your posting.

Your posting was required to start any action

my funds are being transferred weekly to a scam account, because I made a mistake when trying to withdraw those funds.

I believe that the Steem witnesses are aware of this, but have taken no action to unfreeze my account.

There are some users who reported me of your situation, and I assume some of other witnesses would have heard too.

But nothing could be done until you openly declare that your setting the power down path to bittrix was a mistake and you did not want your power down fund to go to bittrix.

Why? Because no one except you can verify that whether you intentionally did it. Who knows whether you actually wanted to send the power down fund to bittrix for whatever reason (your friend's account, or your alt, so on).

Contact jayplayco asap

I will contact them and give them a chance to unfreeze my account and reimburse me directly for the loss I have already had.

You should contact @jayplayco (on discord: jayplayco#9869), as @geekgirl and others have recommended.

And "reimburse" for your mistake? that does not make any sense... you have to admit that it was your fault to set the wrong power down path.

Moving on to the legal issues.

If you have any information about the real world identities of the top witnesses on Steem, please post it here. I will provide a 5% reward of any recovery I make with the people who provide correct information about witness identity (first come, first served on identity of individual witnesses).

I do not know where you live, but this is very dangerous (at least in South Korea). This could be subject to defamation and/or violation of privacy (or more) in South Korea. Take a look at @abitcoinskeptic's reply to your post.

And there are some users who encourage you to pursue legal actions. Of course it is one of your choices.

But reading the replies, I can tell that most of them are not familiar with legal issues, in particular regarding the South Korea case.

If you choose to bring this case to the court, it will be difficult for you to deal with the following issues (and more - I have talked to a lawyer friend and she was not be able to fully understand the situation given her lack of knowledge about how Steem works, but she mentioned these issues to "start with")

  1. How can you prove that you, the plaintiff, own the account called @darthknight ?
  2. How can you prove that you, the plaintiff, does not own the account called @bittrix ? Otherwise, you cannot prove that you "lost" your "asset".
  3. Were you forced to take that action? in other words, anyone forced you to "power down" and/or set the path to "bittrix"?
  4. Who is(are) the defendant?
  5. How can you prove that the defendant has caused you the damage, given that you admit that you made a mistake?
  6. It seems that the "asset" you claim to be lost is used in the system called "Steem blockchain". What are the "rules" of that system? Is there anything that the defendant has(have) violated?

... I will stop here. It's already too many.

And also note that unlike the US, in South Korea if you lose a trial usually you are supposed to pay the winning party's legal fees (up to a certain amount - it's like up to 7~8% of what's at stake).

To move forward.

While talking to guiltyparties and others, I have reviewed the following options.

  1. Run a quick SF update that excludes you: but this option has a problem that may break the mechanical selection rules (as @roelandp pointed out, "You should not help out as goodwill for darthknight, as that will remove the "mechanical" part from the script")
  2. Run a quick SF update that includes bittrix so that this account may not be able to transfer any fund until the discussion ends and temporary SF is reversed.

Of course this needs to be discussed among witnesses, but I personally support the 2nd option for now.


  1. Given that you wrote that you made a mistake in setting the power down path, we can do something.
  2. Contact jayplayco#9869 if you want to resolve this issue fast.
  3. Be careful with legal issues - defamation, etc. Check @abitcoinskeptic 's reply.
  4. I personally support a quick patch to limit transfers of the bittrix account.


Comments 148

Hello,there I read the post of @darthknight and it feels good that you are paying attention to this problem.I don't know him or never had any contact with him.But I felt sorry for him after reading his post.

He has a lot of money staked in Steem. So if by any chance he made a mistake by choosing an account to transfer his fund,then you should help him fix it as soon as possible.I hope that he will soon see your message and reply to you.Thank you for coming forward to help him with a good gesture.

08.04.2020 13:03

I don't understand why suddenly everyone wants to help @darthknight. There is a reason he has those account restrictions. Not sure why?: He is one of the biggest abusers Steem has ever known. Not even spam from a so-called TA specialist is this bad. Not saying he deserves to lose all his funds, no one should, but Karma is a bitch, right?
Pretty sure he owns this bittrix account, and is now asking to get compensated for ´lost´funds. Stating in his introduction he is new and came because JS is in the house. Well yeah, lol.... Who is @kevtorin? An account created around the same time that the ´spoof´account ´bittrix´ is created. The style of writing of darthknight shows me who is behind this account.. And this person is also NOTORIOUS for his actions on the blockchain. DONT give him compensation because he OWNS bittrix.

08.04.2020 13:33

Sounds like you have an idea of who this guy is. If you don't want to name him here, please dm me at glory7#2043.

08.04.2020 13:38

Didnt know this thing has dm feature :D. But you can also find out who it is! With name, face, location and address. You just got to follow the money. Who else uses 101130147 as memo for transactions to deepcrypto8? He lives in the US, so I don't know if you can sue him if he put your private info online. I am not gonna do it, I found him in less then an hour, sure you can too.

08.04.2020 15:16

What letter does his most well know account name on steemit start with?

08.04.2020 20:53


08.04.2020 22:15

No. That's not the same person.

08.04.2020 22:52

And your proof is? Or just a guess?

08.04.2020 23:54

So far all the info shared about sock puppet witnesses was easily found online through Google searches lol

08.04.2020 23:45

I wasnt talking about current Steem witnesses. I say it is easy to find who darthknight is. But I just cant lower myself to a level to put personal info about someone online. I know what could be the consequences of such act.

08.04.2020 23:54

Who is Darthknight?

08.04.2020 13:59

Certainly not a darknight

08.04.2020 16:19

@Darthknight should be know clear. Steem's eyewitnesses did not take his assets. He tried to send STEEM to the wrong address by self. It is a fact. Therefore, it is only the steem witness who can help his problem. But he is trying the problem very hard. Good luck to him.

08.04.2020 14:01

he could solve his problem, and nothing would happen if his account was not and still is blocked from all operations. he would just canceled powerdown and nothing would happen, but witnesses running the Soft fork are blocking him to do so.

08.04.2020 14:48

This is a very good story. Who induced him to make a mistake? Are you the current witness? No, he made a mistake on his own
Making a mistake and SF are separate issues. If he hadn't made a mistake, he would have ignored SF. But there was a problem because he made a mistake. Then he should talk to the witness. I don't think it's a matter of law. he use the law for his own mistakes? This isn't right.

08.04.2020 15:38

your credit card gets stolen (that is your mistake), funds from your credit card are being spend by a guy who stole it. you go to the bank to cancel your card, and they say, it was your mistake, you lost your card, we will not give you an option to cancel your card.

the mistake was his, but witnesses blocking his account are blocking him from fixing it. not to mention that they blocked the private funds only to be able to manipulate the market, no threat to steem blockchain. fund blocking was a market manipulation.

imagine your bank saying to you that you can't spend your money on your account because it will affect the economy?

08.04.2020 15:51

in this case,
Do you make a accusation to the bank? Or
Do you make a request to the bank?

08.04.2020 16:02

so all he needs to do is ask nicely?

Like "please would you be so nice to unblock my account so i can use my funds the way i want?"

08.04.2020 16:12

I don't know it.
If he's been in contact, would he not think again? However, I think it's hard to do it if you say that you are going to mobilize the law like now.

08.04.2020 16:15

men lost 30.000$ currently because of it. yes mistake was his, but he could stop it if ih account was not blocked. he will lose maybe 500.000$ at the end. would you not contact the lawyer? half of mill$ because of the blocked account.

I don't know who he is, i have no idea is he, good, bad, evil, what ever... but if witnesses are ready to do this to people that have 5-6 mill in stake, my account could disappear and no one would even blink. Should i be on the blockchain that tomorrow i can just be gone? should you? are you ok with that?

08.04.2020 16:39

That would be better than threatening a lawsuit. Look i am sympathetic, but his stance probably isnt helping.

08.04.2020 16:18

well we don't know did he tried to contact anyone. witnesses are playing dead about the soft fork, so maybe they are playing dead for this too? you see they are claiming it is not their fault.

08.04.2020 16:42

Its not their fault that he entered the wrong address. Would have been great if he had reached out to the witnesses directly in a soft tone (multiple venues to get there). And maybe offer a carrot - will help talk to the hive witnesses about your airdrop. Quid pro quo anyone?

08.04.2020 17:54

here is an example for current situation, tell me what you think. governments around the world plan to help people because this corona situation. you have a government that decides to give help only to most affected entrepreneurs, is it fair to others? no most probably not, but they did not take anything, they just did not give everyone.

But, then you have a government that decides to freeze bank accounts of people that have a lot of money so they can't spend it, because other people don't have that kind of money.

Witnesses did something that they just weeks ago told that they will never do. and there was no reason to do it, except as a revenge and market manipulation. this has nothing to do with safety of the blockchain. And i am fascinated how all of you are fine with that. and as i said few times now, if they did this to accounts with millions of steem, and all are fine with that, no one would even blink if i wake up with no access to my steem. and that is a bit scary.

08.04.2020 18:38

Its not a permanent hard fork. Its a temporary decision that can be reversed after discussion. Ever heard that line before? Yeah, me too.

Btw your analogy doesnt really make any sense. This is akin to shareholders receiving a 1:2 split of their shares, but because they didnt agree with certain investors, they decided to not grant share split to the those investors. They just didnt give it to everybody so its ok? I isagree.
Im not condoning everything that Stinc is doing and i do see some issues. Once we get over this "turf fight" there should be new governance rules that need to be implemented to make sure these things dont happen again. Its wartime - and rules sometimes do change in times of crisis. (Im making an analogy to what the hive witnesses have done)..

08.04.2020 18:40

yes i heard it, and look who is making all the decisions on the chain with his, "i will never vote or influence governance on the chain, and i will never freeze anyones funds because that is a criminal act", stake. what he does now proves me that there was a real threat to the steem blockchain.

ask @blockbrothers how many votes is needed to go from witness no 1 to witness no 50.

blocking accounts was done as a revenge and market manipulation of few people on steem blockchain, led by a biggest stakeholder. this action has nothing to do with steem blockchain, nothing to do with safety of the chain...

08.04.2020 18:56

Seems like we are wasting both of our time, but unfortunately thats how DPoS works. Guys with most stakes control the witnesses who control the network. Does it have issues? Of course - each user having 30 voted to select 20 witnesses was flawed to begin with. Something that can hopefully be corrected in the future.

Btw Hive guys are trying to take down this chain so we are trying to protect ourselves by acting premptively. You may disagree but thats how some people think. Unfortunately not everyone agrees with everything that you are saying.

08.04.2020 19:08

i agree with the first part fully.

could you just explain me this

Btw Hive guys are trying to take down this chain so we are trying to protect ourselves by acting premptively.

how were blocked accounts a threat to the chain? i don't understand it and i would really like to.

08.04.2020 19:16

They don't have a reply for this question. It hasn't been answered anywhere I can find, it's just stated as a fact.

08.04.2020 19:38

i tried to learn about the threat all over the place, asked witnesses, random people, steemit. one answer from a random user was that powering down and selling steem was a threat.

08.04.2020 20:01

Its not about the power down and selling. If it was just that, I think we would put a red carpet. Their stakes are repeatedly used to try to destroy steem and the users through intentional and malicious downvotes, selfvotes, or spamming. these are not just users, they are bad actors trying to destroy the system. Not to mention the ddos attacks that tried to undermine the stability of the network.

09.04.2020 05:19

well looks like someone lied to you. you can check the account activity here and you can check how much malicious downvotes, selfvotes, and spamming he did.

09.04.2020 13:15

Don't expect them to understand anything, it's like talking to children.

09.04.2020 13:24

Well they might not have done it directly but they are the leaders of the clan. We only went after the top dogs to get their attention and seems like its working?

09.04.2020 13:35

i really hope that this is official opinion, steem witnesses frozen private funds to fight spam, and self voting. you should share that with the crypto world, just to hear their opinion...

09.04.2020 14:46

Lets see how they react when the witnesses first froze a large investor's private property, just to hear their opinion...

09.04.2020 14:51

i don't understand, are you for freezing private property or against freezing private property? or is it just depending on whos funds are frozen?

09.04.2020 14:56

Im against freezing. But i also believe in just retaliation. I dont believe in killing people but if someone tries to kill me with a gun, i will surely defend myself.

09.04.2020 15:11

Just retaliation is not the same as self defense. They are two different things.

10.04.2020 02:47

Its a temporary decision that can be reversed after discussion.

Except that's wrong in this case. It's very permanent once the funds go to the @bittrex account. The clock is ticking, and I really wouldn't want to be one of these witnesses running 22.8888

08.04.2020 19:40

곰돌이가 @ayogom님의 소중한 댓글에 시세변동을 감안하여 $0.016을 보팅해서 $0.026을 지켜드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 7860번 $107.965을 보팅해서 $107.064을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~

15.04.2020 01:39

곰돌이가 @gomdory님의 소중한 댓글에 $0.029을 보팅해서 $0.013을 살려드리고 가요. 곰돌이가 지금까지 총 7899번 $108.927을 보팅해서 $107.740을 구했습니다. @gomdory 곰도뤼~

21.04.2020 11:15


  • Justin Sun
09.04.2020 01:50


09.04.2020 06:05

you lost your credit card, someone is taking money from it. and your bank is blocking you from canceling it.

the mistake whs his, but your actions of blocking private funds was responsible for the loss, because he could not fix it because of your actions.

n South Korea if you lose a trial usually you are supposed to pay the winning party's legal fees (up to a certain amount - it's like up to 7~8% of what's at stake).

he just lost 30.000$ and will lose around 400.000. do you think he cares about 7% of legal fees.

08.04.2020 14:05

It's shocking to me that he believes preventing someone from fixing a correctable mistake, which he intended to correct, is still his fault. This is delusional.

08.04.2020 18:14

He even tried to fix it within the original window before the softfork took effect, but then the sham and sockpuppet witnesses went and changed the soft fork time from 14:00 UTC to 10:00 UTC. Most of the sham witness nodes (all ~10 of them ;) updated less than an hour before 10:00 UTC.

08.04.2020 19:49

Nice initiative taken by @glory7. Hope, it will help him/her a lot.
Keep it up.

08.04.2020 14:17

There are lawyers that specialize in digital assets in Korea, but they are rare. Maybe a lawyer aware of securities and finance would be best.

In anycase, I advise legal consultation before mentioning about legal actions. And yes defamation and privacy are important. Even others mentioned 'doxing' isn't necessary. He can make a private list and at least verify first.

I do think he can prove he owns darth knight by signing a message. However proving he doesn't own bittrix is more difficult.

In anycase, I feel that is irrelevant. He said it's not his and we have no reason to believe it is his. Better to take his word on it and help him out. If anything else, it's the right thing to do.

I don't know if he can get his assets replaced, but this is a bad time to be responsible for freezing him out. The reasons for the freeze in general are iffy given the balance of control for steem is not even close after Hive was made. There is a gap in the timeline that is obvious here.

Anyway, I hope it can be resolved out of the legal system. Usually only lawyers win.

I'm so tired of the arguements that the list is based on a mathematical formula (more so Hive's list that excludes airdrop). It's not like some universal law. Any variable can be added such as 'include accounts only if created before HF21'.

The drama needs to end. I still have vain hope for win-win.

08.04.2020 14:29

You retards better stop worrying about the legal ramifications, and start worrying about a crypto whale who could easily find an onion link to solve this problem for good.

08.04.2020 14:54

Ask yourself: "Is my life worth half a million dollars?"

The witnesses running this fork are playing a dangerous game. Don't take what I'm saying as a threat, I'm just grounded in reality. People have had hits on them for much less, don't be surprised if you start dropping off like flies.

08.04.2020 15:13

I just read this again and for someone saying "dont take this as a threat" it sounds like a death threat. If that's true, well fuck you. I may disagree with the hive guys but would never wish death upon them let alone threaten to kill them.

09.04.2020 05:37

You're allowed to be as dumb as you wish. I'm just telling it like it is, and you can stick your head in the sand and ignore it, or you can understand where I'm coming from and know how things work in the real world.

09.04.2020 12:47

Telling it like it is -> normal people dont talk casually about killing other people. Only criminals and teenagers going through puberty do that. Which one are you?

09.04.2020 13:13

If I warned you that your life is in danger for walking near a cliff, would you call that wishing for murder?

09.04.2020 13:21

If i warned you that you smell like an asshole will you take a shower?

09.04.2020 13:35

If i warned you that
You smell like an asshole will
You take a shower?

                 - menerva

I'm a bot. I detect haiku.

09.04.2020 13:35

What does this even mean? Care to elaborate?

08.04.2020 16:16

Ha. Probably not likely but fair enough. Should at least understand the risks.

08.04.2020 16:26

I hear Koreans like gambling, maybe they should start placing their bets on @jayplaco's time of death.

08.04.2020 17:15

I ll bet on his life every day - fuck it twice a day.

08.04.2020 17:56

Assassination market
An assassination market is a prediction market where any party can place a bet (using anonymous electronic money and pseudonymous remailers) on the date of death of a given individual, and collect a payoff if they "guess" the date accurately. This would incentivise assassination of individuals because the assassin, knowing when the action would take place, could profit by making an accurate bet on the time of the subject's death. Because the payoff is for accurately picking the date rather than performing the action of the assassin, it is substantially more difficult to assign criminal liability for the assassination.

08.04.2020 16:28

They really seem to be pushing for murder now. How much sadder can it get? Now it clearly is a case for the FBI.

09.04.2020 10:41

Seriously. I can take snarks and trolling but just lost it at death threats and dropping personal info. Cant believe ive been sharing this space with such psychopaths. Maybe this fork was a blessing in disguise.

09.04.2020 10:59

Yes, it goes way deeper than most of us were able to see. And I finally understand the meaning of the mirrored pyramid in TRON's logo, where the top is at the bottom. It could point to something like 'let's bring power back to the people'...

Regarding the fork I slowly but surely come to the same conclusion. Looks like it is really a blessing and many of us were just blinded by the dark side. Many work for the deep state. Some don't even know that they do.

I'm glad that I decided for Steem. Something told me that I should not move my tools to their chain. The people are waking up, not only in the real world. Nothing can stop what is coming.

09.04.2020 11:33

I would think twice before basing too much on the views expressed by those still hanging around on Steem only to spread bitterness.

09.04.2020 11:46

After his post complaining about 22.8888, he's been searching for reasons to rationalize implementing the soft fork and getting back into the good graces of the Justin Sun sycophants. He found one in demonizing some accounts, for what amounts to conspiracy, even though his new master continually demonstrates his desire for autocracy. It's sad and pathetic.

10.04.2020 00:47

The most 1984 comment I've read in a while.

10.04.2020 01:49

I'm pushing for murder? NO. I'm aware of things you may be ignorant to, and I'm trying to prevent something like that. I have no idea who darthknight is, and he may be a lovely person, but he's also likely a person with millions of anonymous digital coins that could do shady things to protect his investment.

This same thought occurred to me when SF 22.2 happened. You get between a millionaire and their money, you should know the risks.

09.04.2020 12:45


본죄는 살인죄, 존속살해죄 및 위계위력살인죄를 범할 목적으로 예비 또는 음모함으로써 성립한다.

예비란 범죄실행을 위한 준비행위로서 실행에 착수하지 아니한 것을 말한다. 따라서 살해하려고 낫을 들고 피해자에게 다가서려고 하였으나 제3자가 제지하여 살인의 목적을 이루지 못한 때에는 살인의 실행행위에 착수하였으므로 이미 살인미수죄가 성립한다(대법원 1986.2.25 85도2773).

단순히 범죄를 실현할 의사만으로는 부족하고 객관적으로 실행행위를 가능하게 하거나 용이하게 하는 준비행위가 있을 것을 요한다. 예컨대 권총 등을 교부하면서 사람을 살해하라고 하거나 행동자금을 교부하는 경우가 여기에 해당한다. 음모란 2인 이상의 자 사이에 성립하는 범죄실행의 합의를 말한다.

본죄가 성립하기 위하여는 주관적 구성요건으로 살인죄, 존속살해죄 및 위계위력살인죄를 범할 목적이 있어야 하며, 단순한 미필적 인식으로는 족하지 않다. 그러므로 적어도 살해할 대상자는 구체적으로 특정되어야 본죄가 성립할 수 있다. 예컨대 남파된 간첩이 간첩활동을 저지할 자를 살해할 의사로 무기를 소지하고 있는 것만으로는 본죄가 성립된다고 할 수 없다. 그러나 살해할 대상자가 특정된 이상 살해의사가 조건부인 경우에도 본죄의 성립에는 영향이 없다.

살인을 예비·음모한 자가 실행에 착수하기 전에 이를 중지한 경우에 중지미수의 규정을 준용할 것인가에 대하여는 형의 균형과 중지범의 입법취지에 비추어 볼 때 이를 긍정하는 것이 타당하다. 본죄에 대한 종범의 성립이 가능한가에 대하여는 이를 긍정하는 견해도 있으나, 정범이 실행에 착수하지 아니한 때에는 구성요건적 불법이 실현되었다고 볼 수 없으므로 부정하는 판례의 태도가 타당하다고 생각된다.

본죄와 살인미수 및 살인기수는 보충관계에 있으므로 예비·음모가 발전하여 미수 또는 기수의 단계에 이른 때에는 본죄는 이에 흡수되어 별도로 성립되지 아니한다.

09.04.2020 14:25

i thought this as a joke few hours ago, when someone asked me would i consult a lawyer first, and not talk to the witnesses. i mean half of a mill$ for me is unimaginable amount of money so i have no idea what would i do, but...

08.04.2020 18:44

I've been amazed how quickly the crypto community falls to plea to authority.

08.04.2020 18:12

His keys, his crypto?

Or is this no longer the standard, since the Steemit stake was freezed?

08.04.2020 18:52

Exactly... No, having a "promise" is now justification... Is it not?

08.04.2020 19:09

Tell me, when did this investor ever promise to use his funds only for community building and the development and advancement of Steem?

08.04.2020 19:13

Guess never, I would not do so in his case and also don´t sign a contract which force me to do so ;)

! good point ! --> my point since the beginning of this whole situation beginning with the freezing of the stake of JS.

09.04.2020 15:49

even IF ned agreed (which I think is loose) how determines if it is transferable.

09.04.2020 17:52

Bittrix is a scammer account to catch typo transfers. Just look at the account history.

I think your option 1 would be better and easier to implement, just remove @darthknight from the blacklist.

If you go with option 2, then transfer operations to @bittrix should be blocked. Blocking operations of bittrix, wouldn’t solve anything and continue resulting in loss of funds.

Of course the best move would be to remove all soft fork freezes.

08.04.2020 18:57

Besides, if @darthknight would ever want to see his funds again it would require cooperation from @bittrix. And we all know scammers can quickly disappear never too be heard from again.

Option 2 is pointless, it's a sure way that the funds will never be in control again of the legitimate owner.

08.04.2020 19:18


08.04.2020 19:46

If I helped you by finding out, you know how to help me :D @justyy

08.04.2020 20:43

This is shocking... I really appreciate your help.

Let me know how I can help you (or I will ask @justyy how)

08.04.2020 22:35

You are welcome! Dunno if it helped though but thought, let's throw it to the public. They deserve to know the truth before people are going to give their money, Steem or whatever token to him. The deceptive nature of this person is scary. Imo he tries to use this to get the public behind them, and hurt steem even more. It had to be done. (I don't need anything, I was joking)

08.04.2020 23:33

If this is true (and im leaning towards yes), its really scary. This is some deep state shit. Illiminati, free mason, you name it.

09.04.2020 00:21

It's just a bunch of speculation, if you think that's proof @blocktrades owns @darthknight then your friend @belgianchocolate owns a lot of crypto in his account @bitvavo

09.04.2020 01:26

im at a loss of words. Hard to persuade someone that earth is round after all.

09.04.2020 01:44

And hard to teach someone how blockchains work, that truth matters, and private property exists

09.04.2020 01:48


09.04.2020 01:49

You can support whatever you want. But you lost me at "property rights". Good luck.

09.04.2020 02:00

Just go to this link:, put blocktrades as the sender and deepcrypto8 as the receiver, just look at all the memos.

09.04.2020 07:02

I don't think blocktrades owns darthknight.
I think he uses blocktrades to transfers STEEM to binance.
Just go here, and put blocktrades to binance. You will see a lot of trx with different memos. Then you can pick some memos and search for them, and maybe you will see some legitimate owners on STEEM.

09.04.2020 05:51

Exactly, the only thing repeating memos show is that the receiving account is the same. There's no way to know who is receiving, and there's no way to know who is sending

09.04.2020 06:01

Your information is extremely valuable. If I can change it, I would make you as 90% beneficiary for this posting. As far as I know it is impossible, so I will do that when I write a sequal of this posting later.

09.04.2020 00:29

90% is a lot for just a lot of speculation 🤣😂

Maybe you shoululd ask @belgianccolate about him owning @bitvavo

09.04.2020 01:22


  • Justin Sun
09.04.2020 01:51

That proves nothing lol

09.04.2020 00:29

Thanks for sharing this great tool, I'm enjoying being able to see you talk to yourself on the blockchain 😂 testing1.png

09.04.2020 00:03

And this proves?

09.04.2020 00:25


  • Justin Sun
09.04.2020 01:51

You do realize that whales get special treatment with exchanges, much like high rollers at casinos. I bet BT knows who darthknight is to some degree, but darthknight's actions on the chain tell me he's not any of the known whales out there. Perhaps you take this as proof of something, but that only shows you've supported your own bias rather than let the evidence lead you.

09.04.2020 13:15

LET'S MAKE STEEM GREAT AGAIN! We at Green House Radio Online is going to be hosting a Witness Forum from within Canna Curate discord . I would like to invite any and ALL to join us as we look to RE GROW Steem and all its many communities, business and investors into working together. We promise to offer RESPECTFUL forum for any who wish to join and share their visions and developments for Steem.
We have a few members who have started witnesses @canna-witness @hashkings @chronocrypto who are taking the imitative to start their own witness in hopes to stabilize and repair what has been lost. Please consider our invite to join us as we look to make STEEM GREAT AGAIN.
Canna Curate Discord where @greenhouseradio operates.

09.04.2020 18:02

How about you revert back to 22.1 and stop fucking around!!!

08.04.2020 22:39

Starting a conversation with a fuck doesnt usually yield good results.

09.04.2020 05:07

Is this one of Confucius' wisdoms?

09.04.2020 14:25

do i sense racism?

09.04.2020 14:49

Why do you say that? Confucius was a great philosopher. There's a lot of Confucius jokes around, your line sounded like one. Jokes aren't racism. Don't be like those liberal snowflakes who have no sense of humor.

09.04.2020 15:59

Ah ha so you're a trumper! That makes more sense.

You could have said socrates or plato but immediately brought up confucius because of my racial background.

09.04.2020 16:32

No need to be Trumper to point out liberal stupidity. Stop being a snowflake.

09.04.2020 21:45

At least you have a good sense of humor unlike the other guys.

09.04.2020 21:48

So basically you want him to say that it's all his fault and then you'll give you nothing?

After you've shown that the sock puppet witnesses have no respect for the truth and are nothing but liars, you seriously think you can bargain with someone?

08.04.2020 23:38

Rhetorical question. How would you respond in when your funds get frozen in the first place. Are you really not getting that?? All of this was never on the table IF your (ex) witnesses didn't freeze JS his funds. Its that simple. Its up to the PRESENT witnesses to protect the chain and its token. And they are doing that by blocking transfers. If someone makes a ´typo´(not saying it is) or whatever with his own account, its not the responsibility of the witnesses to fix that. If I transfer to the wrong person, Steemit will not help me, nor a witness, or an update. Why would we have to put risk on the chain when not necessary?

08.04.2020 23:48

Protecting a chain is just manipulating prices to you? The accounts want to leave, you're the one keeping them around lol. You're so scared about Steem's price, you have to freeze investor funds to keep it from dropping

If you made a typo, but before you hit send you saw it and wanted to fix it, but I tied you up to a chair and I hit send, is that my fault or your fault?

09.04.2020 00:15

No one is worried about the price of steem right now. Maybe in the future but not now. Thx.

09.04.2020 00:23

Then why do you think large accounts powering down and selling is a threat to Steem? 😂

09.04.2020 00:27

You like to miss the point do you? Its not about the power down and selling. If it was just that, I think we would put a red carpet and say Adieu, auf wiedersehen. It is repeatedly used to try to destroy steem and his users. Not only in downvotes, selfvotes, or whatever. Nobody got forced, it was his choice to push the button to send it to this account. I really dont even care about that because he abused my and everyone's interest.

09.04.2020 00:50

I could have sworn the socks put a freeze on powering down. Hm, maybe that was an accident. Maybe the socks wanted to let them power down and leave, but since the code was copy and pasted they didn't know what to change.

Also, Justin Sun is fine with self voting, he's done it himself and he delegates to people so they can earn more by self voting, idk why you're complaining. He could censor you for criticizing him!

He also pushed a button to change it and the socks stopped that. But I get it, you don't care about or respect other people's property, you only care about yourself. You fit right in with the socks that break their promises in less then a month.

09.04.2020 01:11

It is a temporary update to protect mine, yours, and everyone who has assets on the blockchain.
The moment JS upvoted his OWN post was when he got censored by donkies on his own fucking frontend! Do you know who owns Steemit?
Pretty sure JS lost more then this person, so no I dont see why I should feel sorry for this account. Months of slander, reputation damage and hate from some people where directed to someone who LEGALLY bought all he owns. Forgetting this part?

09.04.2020 01:30

I mean, I appreciate the price manipulation some since I get cheap Hive, I'd just like the people who made this blockchain what it is to be able to get cheap hive too. I see the current socks saying that maybe they should erase my current Steem as a much bigger threat.

Lol, a $300 upvote was not necessary, he could have voted for much less, plus he was not censored, at the the very most his post was collapsed. You wanna talk about self upvoting, let's talk about @bullionstackers who Sun gave a delegation to after his very long history of self upvoting his own comments.

JS lost 0 funds, idk why you are making stuff up.
Months of slander, reputation damage and hate from some people are being directed to accounts that LEGALLY bought all they own. Forgetting this part?

09.04.2020 01:41


  • Justin Sun
09.04.2020 01:50

I honestly dont know what you do, but you spend an awful lot of time posting on steemit for a guy sleeping with hive. I dont see a lot of steem users trolling on hive, its usually vice versa.

09.04.2020 01:38

Sometimes I use SteemPeak 😉

09.04.2020 01:42

I don't see a lot of Steem users telling the truth about Hive, its usually vice versa

09.04.2020 01:45

Yes you use Steempeak because you can't let go. Steem is something special right, I am sorry you got breastfeeded lies and assumptions by your current Hive witnesses. I am sorry that your brain cant see the truth while it is right in front of you. Tunnelvision? Let me tell you the truth about Hive. Its a sustained hardfork, near worthless in the near future because the persons at the top DONT have the best interest in their users. Will takes some time before the stubborn see that. I am confident time will tell.

09.04.2020 06:44

You get it belgianchocolate. Im tired of arguing with these cult followers. I think i ll go take a hike.

09.04.2020 01:36

- Justin Sun

09.04.2020 03:33

귀엽다 이놈아 ㅋㅋ

09.04.2020 03:35

Quiero recordar cuántos de los usuarios que perdieron sus fondos en cuentas fake, que simularon ser las oficiales para los exchanges, ayudaron a recuperar su dinero los Witness... Recuerdo muy bien que hubo una oleada en la que tuvimos incluso que llamar la atención a los usuarios por la gran cantidad de errores al transferir. Por cierto que me parece extraño, porque ahora y antes no, cuando tecleas el nombre de usuario te aparece listado como predicción el nombre de la cuenta a la que has transferido antes. ¿Será que él nunca antes transfirió a Bitrex?

Esto es muy sospechoso.

09.04.2020 01:19

Do I smell trouble in the Steemit Inc. paradise???

09.04.2020 03:13
Go fuck yourself scumbag!
I hope you get sued into bankruptcy, lose your whole family to covid, and then slowly die cold and alone of your severe syphilis .
09.04.2020 07:16

Lowlife level words... pathetic.

It seems that what you wrote is probably what you will experience in the near future.

Good luck, barking dog!

09.04.2020 08:19

You don't deserve any better. You're openly holding users and an exchange for RANSOM so you can get a HIVE airdrop. We all saw the chat logs, you're so full of shit it's amazing you can function at all. Go fuck yourself

09.04.2020 09:21

Another reply from a confirmed lowlife.

It seems that your delusion is going even worse. I would recommend you to see a doctor.

Oh, just realized that maybe you cannot afford it. Sad.

09.04.2020 09:55

My delusion ? Are you denying that the HIVE airdrop is your sole motivation for freezing funds on Steem ?
I have the full chat log. It reads just like the first "negotiation" with TRON where their ONLY demand was faster powerdowns, except your only demand is a HIVE airdrop. Because you 100% know that Steem is FUCKED through your OWN ACTIONS.

Again. GFY

09.04.2020 10:01

Again, it seems that you really need some medication and/or reading comprehension training.

Oh, and of cource you need to learn proper manners, but I won't expect too much from a lowlife like you. Again, pathetic and sad.

09.04.2020 10:33

Hmm yes. Lets see what others think about my reading comprehension :

Manners and respect are earned. I treated you with respect for years, but you've made it very clear that it was badly misplaced. You are scum, and will be treated like scum everywhere from now on. Go fuck yourself.

09.04.2020 10:41

Years? I am pretty sure that we did not know each other before the steem inc transaction, so it would have been like 2 months at most.

Again, delusional...

And it seems that the link is about the part of the conversation I had with @roelandp. Didn't know that he also lacks basic manner and disclose the converstation with another person (who tried to help him) without permission. Hm. Maybe I was expecting too much from you guys.

Anyway, that conversation clearly shows that roelandp asked about the selection criteria but could not even find an official announcement, so I had to give the proper link to be on the same page. After that, what I suggested is if you reconsider airdrop thing, we reconsider sf too. It is not about the reason of sf - I simply suggested a way to start negotiation.

If you still cannot understand at this point, I give up.

09.04.2020 11:01

You've been a well known reward farmer for years. I was aware of you, even though you had no awareness of the top consensus witnesses until recently.

I shared the log, because it's relevant when you're actively lying and holding user and exchange funds hostage. Roeland will probably be pissed at me for sharing it too - but I value transparency and truth over personal relationships.

We had all read the announcement before this conversation even happened, the announcement was terribly written and does not convey the message you seem to think it does.

I understand everything I need to understand. You're a scumbag that's lying about your motivations and holding user funds for ransom. Go fuck yourself.

09.04.2020 11:11

What is the reason for blocking the accounts from cancelling powerdowns? How is that operation harmful for the blockchain?

09.04.2020 10:43

You're doing a great job on Steem, on the blockchain where investors accounts are being frozen and spineless idiots like you are blaming the frozen accounts for being frozen.

09.04.2020 10:47

hey @glory7 you know, this guy illustrates an old French proverb: there are only the cowards and the weak who insult and threaten !!!

09.04.2020 22:02

That's a great proverb that could be applied in many cases, in particular this one. Thank you.

11.04.2020 13:25

I'm higly impressed with your reply @glory7

It's hard to see people so mature and well prepared. Respect,

Yours, Piotr

09.04.2020 22:24

All this seems pretty centralized to me. Why does one person hold the keys to moving this forward? It all seems pretty injurious to me. These witnesses do not care about the community.

10.04.2020 02:17