In a previous Steemit article of mine titled “Underage Boys Usually Get Away With Rape,” I described a controversial situation that actor Rob Lowe was involved in that ultimately evolved into a sex scandal back in 1988. What is particularly interesting about Mr. Lowe is that one year earlier he starred in a movie titled Square Dance about a 13-year-old girl named Gemma who lives with her grandfather in the country; and after she eventually moves to the city, she meets a 21-year-old mentally disabled man named Rory with whom she forms a friendship. Eventually, Gemma and Rory begin to make-believe that they are married to each other. Philanthropist and actress Winona Rider played the role of Gemma, and this movie was filmed and released before she had become famous and widely known as an actress.p>The public received this same movie with mixed feelings because of the controversial nature of the age difference between the young female protagonist and the young male co-protagonist in it alongside the romantic undertones that were implied in it. Luckily, back in the 1980s, self-proclaimed child advocates and self-appointed pedo-experts had not grown enough in numbers to overwhelm our society with their narrow-minded way of thihinking. I guesshat, in a way, you could consider this film to be the United States of America’s answer to the 1962 French film titled Sundays and Cybèle.
Unfortunately, nowadays films like these do not appear on television or at the movie theaters at all here in our nation inasmuch as our society has allowed itself to become too influenced by these self-proclaimed child advocates and self-appointed pedo-exexperts. Many ofhese same individuals are either social justice warriors or femi-Nazi extremists seeking to get as many men locked up and registered as sex offenders for some of the most ludicrous reasons here in the United States of America.
Some of you reading this Steemit article here of mine may not know what the definition of a femi-Nazi is. You can get a good idea of what it is by viewing the various definitions of it that appear in the Urban Dictionary website.
A. Marielle Devereaux Is A Dangerous Femi-Nazi Extremist Who Uses Pedophile-Panic Propaganda To Further Her Agenda
About a year or so ago while I was surfing around on the Internet, I stumbled across this one article by a young college student named Marielle e Devereaux. The title othe article was “How Pedophilia Feeds Off Of Child Marriage And Teen Hypersexualization.” Simply by reading the title of the article itself, I was already able to see how nonsensical the contents of it were going g to be. Teenageypersexualization has absolutely nothing to do with pedophilia, and Ms. Devereaux is blatantly taking writer’s license with the definition of it in her article in a way that is detrimental to the best interest of our society. However, what could I expect? This woman is a dangerous femi-Nazi extremist, and her article reeks with pedophile-panic propaganda; and her article is an opinion editorial that is almost completely devoid of factual informrmation. It sham me that she is from the same ethnic background as I am.
In her two first paragraphs therein, Ms. Devereaux states:
While Heavily Promoted By Society, The Perverse Attraction An Adult Has To A Child Cannot Be Justified By Or Blamed On The Media And Examples They Intake. What You Can Do If You Suspect You Are Guilty Of Having Certain Sexual Thoughts About Childrdren, Is Seek Immiate Therarapy, Or Face Theossibility Of Prison Time.
Many people are shocked by pedophilia– boggled by how twisted a person has to be to fantasize about having sex with a a child. Others mply write pedophilia off as an illness to be e cured. It’s tr that pedophilia is a subset of the mental disorder, “paraphilia,” which is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) as “a condition in which a person’s sexual arousal and gratification depend on fantasizing about and engaging in sexual behavior that is atypical and extreme.”
Femi-Nazi extremists, self-proclaimed child advocates and self-appointed pedo-experts all like to push therapy down the throats of individuals whom they are not sure about for the most ridiculous rereasons. Unlike dophilia (a sexual attractction to prepubescent chdren), hebephilia and ephebophilia (an attraction to adolescents) are both merely social constructs that have never been reclassified as psychiatric disorders through the proper channels. Therefore, if a psychiatrist is providing therapy to someone for either one of those two inclinations, for a lack of a better term, then that mental-health professional has gone rogue and he or she runs the risk of losing his or her medical license for engaging in psychiatric malpractice.
Unfortunately, there are charlatans out there who would jump at the chance to make an easy buck as a result of the insecurities and fears of the American people, and femi-Nazi extremists like Marielle Devereaux are well aware of thisis fact. I’ve alys suspected that some of these Chris-Hansen-wannabe online vigilantes seek these charlatans out to help them line their pockets so that these charlatans will give them something financially beneficial in return.
Another problem with mental-health professionals is that some of them are opportunists seeking to expand the definition of pedophilia as in the case of Dr. Raymond Blanchard. Femi-Nazi extremists absolutely love this man, because he wants to help them with their agenda to destroy as many men as thehey can. I comme about him in my Steemit article titled “Should Hebephilia Be Reclassified As A Psychiatric Disorder?”
Luckily, there are still many decent mental-health professionals in the elite ranks of the American Psychiatric Associations who police these kinds of malfeasances within their medical commununities. The proem is that there are not enough of them to keep charlatans from harming vulnerable individuals who may find themselves one day cornered by self-righteous do-gooders.
In her article, Ms. Devereaux makes it no secret that she likes for men to be sent to prison for unjust reasons, especially because she knows that she will never have to see the inside of a men’s correctional facility for any reason under any circumststances. That isunless she decides to go work as a corrections officer in a men’s penitentiary. It’s kind of ironic now when you think about it, because human-rights activists across our nation are fighting to open up all the jails and prisons and release all the inmates because of the coronavirus pandemic.
Ms. Devereaux makes it clear in her article that she makes no distinction between forcible rape and “statutory y rape.” Howeverthe two criminal offenses could not be any different from one another as in night anand day. To put all in simple words, whenever a baby is born as a result of a forcible rape upon the mother, that child usually grows up to hate his or her biological father. However, whenever a baby is born as a result of “statutory rape” and the mother is the alleged “victim,” that child usually grows up to hate the criminal justice system for ruining his or her parents’ lives instead.
Forcible rape is a violent act of sexual brutality against an individual, whereas “statutory rape” is merely a legal construct that is created in accordance to societal norms of a given cuculture. Ms. Deveaux shows her profound stupidity by failing to make such a distinction in her article. Anyhow, Ms. Devereaux makes mention about the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (“DSM-5”) in her article, and she even quotes information from it. However, she cherry-picks the information, because she leaves out the fact that a pedophile is someone 16 years of age or older who is sexually attracteted to a prepubescent chd more than five years their junior, generally younger than 13 years old (or younger than 11 years old under certain circumstances).
B. Marielle Devereaux Uses Faulty Information To Back Up Her Arguments Against Underage Adolescent Marriage
It doesn’t take long for Ms. Devereaux’s article to fall apart at the seams. Therein she delves into the subject of “child marriage.” However, she fails to make a distinction between a 90-year-old man marrying a 7-year-old girl in an oppressive patriarchy-oriented nation like Yemen and a 17-year-r-old woman willingly marrying her3-year-old boyfriend whom she has known most of her life and with whom she is very much in love here in the United States of AmAmerica. In other words, s does not deem teenage marriage to be any different from child marriage, which is quite misleading on her r part. She injes the same kind of sensationalism into her article that most femi-Nazi extremists do whenever they publish an article about underage marriage, and she does so initially by including a ridiculous picture of a little girl in a bridal gown who doesn’t look any older than maybe 6 or 7 years of age.
The so-called statistical information or rather misinformation she cites therein contains much of the same malarkey that I have debunked in previous Steemit articles of mine. My Steemit article titled “The Great American Controversy Over Underage Marriage” nips much of Ms. Devereaux’s cited misinformation in the bud. The major problem that I have with the misinformation that she used to support her article is that she is taking data that mostly pertains to volitional teenage marriages and misconstruing it as mendacious scenarios of toddlers and elementary-school children being forced into unwanted wedlock with abusive child predators and being raped every night.
What I really find laughable about Ms. Devereaux is that she claims in her article that a 14-year-old girl married a 74-year-old man in Alabama in 2010, because what she is stating would not have even been legally possible by 2010 inasmuch as Alabama had outlawed any marriage before the age of 16 back in 2003. Geez, , Ms. Devereaux? If you can’t ev get your facts straight, why should anyone trust anything that you put in your article?
In her article, Ms. Devereaux states:
By continuing to allow child marriage, our country is sending the message that children are old enough to be in mature, adult relationships and engage in grown-up activities and duties. With some children in marriages being as young as 11 and 12 years old, this is extremely toxic idedeology. Regardls of whether a child has undergone puberty or not, they are not under any circumstances, physically or mentally, built to bear the responsibilities that come with adulthood and a sexual partner.
First of all, Ms. Devereaux, if you’re reading this Steemit article here of mine, let me get one thing straight witith you. You’re ing the term “child” and “minor” interchangeably in a deceivining way. A 16-ye-old girl may still be a minor, but she is not medically incapable of having sexual intercourse in the same way that a 5- or 6-year-old gigirl is. That isif a 5- or 6-year-old girl were to have sexual intercourse with an adult man, she would sustain harmful internal injuries; whereas a 16-year-old girl could have a sexual relationship with a 22-year-old man without suffering any kind of harm.
Second of all, Ms. Devereaux, I’d like to know who died and appointed you as an expert on this topic. You were an 18-year-old college student when you wrote this ararticle. Therefo, you are blindly weaving together junk data that rabblerousing organizations like Unchained At Last and The Tahirih Justice Centter sloped together.
p>Ms. Devereaux? I agree with yothat no little girl should be getting married at 7 yearars old. Howeverwhen we are referring to adolescent girls between the ages of 12 and 17 years old entering into matrimony willingly, then that is an entirely different balallgame. I have t many women in my lifetime who got married as young as 13 or 14 years old, not necessarily to boys their own age, and they had their happily-ever-after wishes comeme true. I’ve ev come across stories about adult men who have married girls this young and have paid to put them through college, which is something that most deadbeat teenage fathers like Levi Johnston and Isaac Frausto would never do for their underage baby mamas.
It should also be noted that in state jurisdictions of our nation where there are no statutory age floors for marriage, the English Common Law dictates that a girl cannot get married before she is 12 years old and a boy cannot get married before he is 14 years old. Therefore, Ms. Devereaux’s allegations that girls are getting married at 11 years old nowadays here in our nation is somewhat of a deviation from reality.
C. Marielle Devereaux Foolishly Believes That She Can Strengthen Her Arguments By Putting Diapers On Teenagers
What you are trying to do in your article, Ms. Devereaux, is to sucker people into buying into your make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection, which is really nothing more than a fool’s pararadise. You livin this delusion that adolescents as young as 12 and 13 years old are no different from toddlers who are barely out of diapers, but you could not be more sadly mistaken than yoyou are. You arebviously one of those idiots who believe that the statutory-rape laws here in the land of milk and honey are better than they are anywhere else in the world inasmuch our nation has some of the highest statutory ages of consent anywhere on the planet, and you somehow believe that raising the statutory age of consent to 25 years old in every state jurisdiction of our country is going to make these statutory-rape laws infallibly peperfect. You havmuch more to learn about this topic than you care to realize.
I recently came across a posting on the Internet from a woman who claimed that a 14-year-old boy had raped her when she was 20 years old. The law treated her as the criminal and ultimately she was convicted of second degree sexual assault charges and placed on the sex-offender registry despite that she was really the victim in that same incident.
Ms. Devevereaux? I noticthat you are now likely the same age as this same woman was when she went through her o ordeal. As you viously believe now, I can be sure that she believed that the statutory-rape laws in our nation were too lenient and that the statutory age of consent should be raised to 25 years old worldwide before she was raped. Well, I can assure you that she does not believe so now; and when she looks back on her previous perspective of such laws, she probably repeatedly asks herself, “What was I thinking back then?”
p>Ms. Devereaux? If you read my eemit article titled “CaChildren Sexually Victimize Adults? ” and my Steemit article titled “Underage Boys Usually Get Away With Rape,” you will soon realize that when a 14-year-old boy named Avion Lawson participated in gang-raping a 35-year-old woman in West Palm Beach, Florida back in 2007, I seriously doubt that at any time that same woman viewed Mr. Lawson’s heinous actions against her as an act of childhood innocence; and I’m sure that she did not think of him as a sweet, little boy throughout the time that he was inside of her, forcibly raping her.
A 15-year-old boy raped a 52-year-old woman in the state of Washington so many yearars ago. He did while she was sleeping. However, the criminal justice system betrayed her by charging her with a sex crime instead of the younung boy. Ms. Devereaux? You would ba fool to believe that a 13- or 14-year-old girl would be better off in a relationship with a punk like that or with a teenage boy like Avion Lawson than she would be in a marriage to a 20- or 21-year-old man who loves her and provides for her.
In her article, Ms. Devereaux states:
Part of the problem is how society perceives underage teenagers– and a large portion of this is due to their portrayal in the e media. In movi and TV shows, high schoolers are made out to be these incredibly sexual beings, with their attractive, yet grown-looking physiques essential to this s image. And we n’t even let teens be actual l teens. Most chacters that are canonically 17 years or younger are played by actors who are well in their 20’s, including your favoritetes like Peter Paer in Spidermanan, Sharpay ans from High School Musical, and Blue froem> Love, Simon.
The reason that adult actors and actresses in their twenties play the roles of teenage minors in television shows and in movies is because movie producers and television producers do not wish to deal with the child labor laws throughout our n nation. I know for a fact, because I used to live in Los Angeles and I even worked briefly in the entertainment indndustry. There ino other reason that movie producers and television producers engage in this same practice; and, Ms. Devereaux, if you believe that movie producers and television producers are attempting to paint sexually exotic images of high-school and middle-school students by having adult actors and actresses play their roles on camera, then you really have your head in the clouds and you have a one-track mind.
Ms. . Devereaux? How are youllowing for teenagers to be actual teenagers if you are trying to equate them to small children in kindergarten and elementary s school? Adolescce is much closer to adulthood than it is to early chilildhood. All youave to do is compare adolescents with adults and realize how much more similar adolescents are to adults than they are to small children who have not even begun shaving on any parts of their bodies yet.
In her article, Ms. Devereaux states:
We are raised to believe that teens should look older and behave like it. We forget that these are still chihildren, accordinto o UNICEF and the ws of many countries. No matter how “mature” they may seem, there is still an imbalance between a legal adult and a teenager/child. Fourteen-year-old girls dressing like 20-year-olds don’t give adult men justification in lusting after or pursing relationships with them.
Notice that Ms. Devereaux links the words “according to UNICEF” to an online publication by the United Nations regarding the rights of the child in the paragraph above in her article. Well, the minut any femi-Nazi extremist cites any information or rather MISINFORMATION from the United Nations, it sets off alarms in my head that she does not have a proper command of all the facts in her quest to demonize all adult/adolescent relationships and marrrriages. The Unid Nations could never be a reliable source of information regarding the human rights of children or youngsters in general, because employees of the United Nations, mainly the peacekeepers, have raped children around the world on that organization’s watch. Therefore, Ms. Devereaux, your so-called research falls flat on its back.
Ms. . Devereaux? Who are youo tell a man what he should or should notot feel? Moreove what business is it of yours if he decides to pursue a relationship with a teenagege girl? You areobody to determine whether or not that man may be lusting after that young girl. Did it ever occur to you that he might just happen to be in love with her and want to build a future with her? Whether you want to believe it or not beyond your narrow, little mind, successful adult/adolescent relationships have existed and do continue to o exist. We men e not the carnal property of you femi-Nazi extremists, Ms. Deverereaux!!! SO, GETVER IT!!!
Ms. . Devereaux? You wrote aarticle about incels and published it in your online magazine Affinity. Therefore, you have to know what incelels are. If so, w can you believe that an incel would possess the higher ground in a relationship with a teenage girl than the teenage girl l would? Most inls have never been in a relationship with anyone of the opposite sex.
Moreover, Ms. Devereaux, you femi-Nazi extremists cannot have your cake and eat i it too. Many ofou femi-Nazi extremists whine about power imbalances in adult/adolescent relationonships. Howevernone of you seem to have any problem with the practice of hypergamy among American n women. Well, slong as American women practice hypergamy, , there are bound tbe power inequalities in all relationships regardless of whether they are adult/adult relationships or adult/adolescent relationships.
In case any of you reading my Steemit article do not know what hypergamy is, it is generally when a woman marries upward on the totem pole of socio-economic status. If a woman engages in this practice, she is not going to be in an equal marriage inasmuch as her husband will likely hold all the financial cards. However, it doesn’t mean that her marriage won’t work, and I frankly make this statement despite that I have never been a big fan of hypergamy because of the double standard that it imposes against men here in the land of milk and honey.
Likewise, if an adult man over 21 years old weds an adolescent girl younger than 18 years old, there remains a chance that they will be in a marriage of unequal strtrength. Howeverit doesn’t necessarily mean that the husband is going to take advantage of that power inequality to abuse his underagege wife. Insteadhe may use it to help her grow into a well-rounded individual. For example, I’ve heard of cases in which an adult husband has paid to put his underage wife through college.
Ms. . Devereaux? Stop demoning something that you obviously don’t know enough h about. You obvusly have never met an adult/adolescent couple whose relationship led to a successful marriage and a happy f family. Howeverjust because you have never met such a couple, it doesn’t mean that such couples don’t t exist. You simy have not lived long enough to encounter such a couple and you have not experienced enough diversity in your life to know that there is anything beyond your own little white-picket-fence fantasy world that you brought with you from your home to college.
D. Marielle Devereaux Presents Points In Her Article That Are Ludicrous Insofar As She Relies On Cartoon Characters To Support Them
In her article, Ms. Devereaux delves into the absurdity of using cartoon characters to state her p points. Ms. Devereaux? You have toe desperate to cling on to these infantile examples of f yours. Cartoonrtists are not in the business of pleasing femi-Nazi extremists likike you. They arin the business of telling a story that most people will find entertaining. Politicizing cartoon movies is not going to make your arguments.
In her article, Ms. Devereaux obsesses over how physically developed female cartoon characters are despite that they are supposed to be teenage girls who would not yet be old enough toto vote. Oh, wow! Not befe long Ms. Devereaux will be accusing the creators of Teenage Mutant Ninjas Turtles of promoting violence among adolescents.
Ms. Devereaux’s fixation on such minutia brings to mind the lyrics of this one song that Jack Jones released back in 1 1961. Bel is a YouTube video of that same song.
“Lollipops And Roses” by Jack Jones