Steemit Crypto Academy- Steem Blockchain(Convergent Linear Reward)- Week 6 @danay


image.png

Español

English


steemit 2.jpg


-¡Hola a todos! hoy continuo con mis actividades en este increíble recorrido por los cursos del profesor @sapwood, gracias por compartir sus conocimientos con todos nosotros, estaré haciendo mi mejor trabajo en realizar esta tarea, aquí les comparto mi mejor explicación sobre la conferencia.
Hi everyone! today I continue with my activities in this amazing course tour of professor @sapwood, thank you for sharing your knowledge with all of us, I will be doing my best job in doing this task, here I share my best explanation about the lecture.


steemit 2.jpg


pregunta 1.jpg

-De acuerdo a la explicación del profesor y lo que pude entender, es que hay una diferencia entre ecuación lineal cuadrática / lineal y convergente (curva de recompensa), que serian las ramificaciones económicas y sociales, estás explican lo que significa las recompensas obtenidas si votamos por nosotros mismos, o por otras publicaciones.
According to the professor's explanation and what I could understand, there is a difference between linear quadratic / linear and convergent linear equation (reward curve), which would be the economic and social ramifications, these explain what it means the rewards obtained if we vote for ourselves, or for other publications.


-Hace cinco años el valor de la recompensa que se manejaba, en referencia al auto voto era un poco injusta, porque no permitía a los nuevos usuarios tener la misma oportunidad de crecimiento, que los usuarios más viejos, porque se encontró en ese momento, que la gente recurría al auto voto, haciendo que se recompensara contenidos de calidad deficiente y haciendo un mal uso de los recursos para la votación social.
Five years ago the value of the reward that was handled, in reference to self voting was a little unfair, because it did not allow new users to have the same opportunity for growth, as older users, because it was found at that time, that people resorted to self voting, making it reward poor quality content and making poor use of resources for social voting.


-Steemit realizo un gran cambio en el 2019 con la nueva recompensa lineal convergente, permitiendo que todos los usuarios tuvieran la misma oportunidad de ser votados, al generar y publicar contenido de calidad, que aporta valor a la plataforma, que es su principal propósito. Por lo que hoy en día se valora y se fomenta la búsqueda de contenido brillante, mediante al voto a favor de otras publicaciones y elimina el auto voto, porque no se recompensa nada bien.
Steemit made a big change in 2019 with the new converged linear reward, allowing all users to have the same opportunity to be voted, by generating and publishing quality content, which brings value to the platform, which is its main purpose. So today the search for brilliant content is valued and encouraged, by voting in favor of other publications and eliminating the self-vote, because it is not rewarded well at all.


pregunta 2.jpg

-Diferencia del juicio aislado y juicio comunitario, es el nivel de recompensas que obtienes en los dos casos, porque en el juicio aislado las recompensas obtenidas son casi nulas, y si no tienes poder de voto suficiente, no podrás obtener recompensas por votaciones que hagas con juicio aislado, en cambio si decides votar siguiendo el juicio comunitario, el beneficio que obtienes es mucho mayor en cuanto a recompensas.
The difference between the isolated trial and the community trial is the level of rewards that you obtain in both cases, because in the isolated trial the rewards obtained are almost null, and if you do not have enough voting power, you will not be able to obtain rewards for votes that you make with the isolated trial, on the other hand if you decide to vote following the community trial, the benefit that you obtain is much greater in terms of rewards.


-Si no tienes suficiente SP y decides votar cualquier publicación, que no se considere como buen contenido y no que haya recibido ningún tipo de votación, pues abras perdido ese voto, porque no recibirás recompensas por curación, en cambio si decides votar siguiendo el juicio comunitario, votando en publicaciones que estén en el top de tendencias, las recompensas que puedes recibir aumentan su porcentaje, y estarás recibiendo una ganancia por hacer lo correcto.
If you do not have enough SP and you decide to vote any publication, which is not considered as good content and has not received any kind of vote, then you have lost that vote, because you will not receive rewards for healing, instead if you decide to vote following the community judgment, voting on publications that are in the top of trends, the rewards you can receive increase their percentage, and you will be receiving a profit for doing the right thing.


-El juicio se adapta de la siguiente manera, es fácil comprender que si los usuarios que van a votar, a estos se les denomina curadores, se ponen de acuerdo para dar su voto a una publicación que califique para buen contenido, se estaría realizando una curación comunitaria que permite que todos obtengan buenas recompensas por su votación comunitaria. Y evidentemente genera una motivación para todo aquel que desea obtener buenas recompensas o ganancias económicas, y eso fomenta la curación comunitaria, y que exista la interacción social entre los usuarios.
The trial is adapted in the following way, it is easy to understand that if the users who are going to vote, these are called curators, agree to give their vote to a publication that qualifies for good content, a community curation would be performed that allows everyone to get good rewards for their community vote. And obviously it generates a motivation for everyone who wants to get good rewards or economic gains, and that encourages community curation, and that there is social interaction between users.


pregunta 3.jpg


-Aquí pueden ver mi SP es de 134,965. Aun no poseo un poder de voto mayor a 0.00$.
Here you can see my SP is 134,965. I still do not have a voting power greater than 0.00$.


mi sp.jpg

-Una publicación con valor de más de 10$ antes de ser votada por mi.
A post worth more than $10 before it was voted on by me.


antes de votar 10$.jpg

-La misma publicación, después de ser votada por mi.
The same publication, after being voted by me.

despues de votar 10$.jpg


-Su puntaje tuvo una disminución en el voto, pienso que es debido a mi bajo poder de voto, no aporto nada a una publicación así.
Its score had a decrease in vote, I think it's because of my low voting power, I don't contribute anything to such a publication.

-Una publicación con valor de más de 100$ antes de ser votada por mi.
A publication worth more than $100 before being voted by me.


antes de votar 100$.jpg

-La misma publicación, después de ser votada por mi.
The same publication, after being voted by me.


mayor 100$ despues de vttar.jpg

-Antes de votar, el pago posterior era = $ 104.26
Después de votar, el pago posterior era = $ 104.53

Diferencia = $ 104.53- $ 104.26 = $ 0.27

Before voting, subsequent payment was = $ 104.26
After voting, the subsequent payment was = $ 104.53

Difference = $ 104.53- $ 104.26 = $ 0.27


-Como lo mencione antes, la diferencia de mayor valor de Upvote, fue la publicación que tenia un valor mayor a 100$, mi recompensa fue de un 0.27$ a diferencia de la publicación con menor valor a 10$, lo que ocurrió fue que el puntaje disminuyo, en vez de aumentar. Esto se debe al juicio aislado, por lo que se recomienda hacer curación siguiendo el juicio comunitario, en mi caso aun no tengo un peso de voto mayor a 0.00$, por lo que me debo ajustar al juicio comunitario. Es posible que cuando posea un mayor peso de voto, podre tener una influencia en publicaciones que tengan un bajo puntaje, siempre y cuando sea contenido brillante y de calidad.
As I mentioned before, the difference of the highest Upvote value, was the publication that had a value greater than 100$, my reward was 0.27$ as opposed to the publication with a lower value of 10$, what happened was that the score decreased, instead of increasing. This is due to the isolated judgment, so it is recommended to make healing following the community judgment, in my case I still do not have a vote weight greater than 0.00$, so I must adjust to the community judgment. It is possible that when I have a higher voting weight, I can have an influence on publications that have a low score, as long as it is brilliant and quality content.


Agradezco al profesor por esta clase magistral, me ha abierto mucho los ojos en el mundo de Steemit y poder entender como funciona su sistema de votos.

I thank the professor for this master class, it has really opened my eyes to the world of Steemit and to be able to understand how their voting system works.



cintillo para steemit.jpg

Los separadores y cintillo son de mi autoria, para uso exclusivo de Steemit.
Las capture de pantalla son de mi autoria.

Cc: -
@steemitblog
@steemcurator01
@steemcurator02
@sapwood

¡Gracias por su gran apoyo, mis queridos Steemians!


Comments 1


Thank you for attending the lecture in Steemit-Crypto-Academy & doing the homework task-6.

Steemit made a big change in 2019 with the new converged linear reward, allowing all users to have the same opportunity to be voted, by generating and publishing quality content, which brings value to the platform, which is its main purpose. So today the search for brilliant content is valued and encouraged, by voting in favor of other publications and eliminating the self-vote, because it is not rewarded well at all.

The convergent linear reward was introduced in 2019 to encourage the users to visit other's posts and curate, by doing so will form an interconnected web and a better content discovery. Economically the users find it more advantageous to upvote others instead of self-upvoting.

Social & Economic ramifications

Economic ramifications- Convergent linear reward does not produce higher upvote values if it is an isolated judgment, you won't get more if you happen to be the only one(or a select few, with low SP) as a voter in that post/comment. But if you engage and find good content and you upvote, then you also earn more reward than self-upvote, because most of the users reach an agreement on quality content, hence the overall SP of all users voting such a post push the reward curve to linearity, most of the time you earn more than self-upvote.

Social ramification- Instead of self-upvoting, if you go out and find good content which is valuable for the community, then by default you reach an agreement with the community & most of the time you win more, and at the same time you are helping that user(s), overall you are building a social network. Self-upvote diminishes the potential and evolution of a social network.

If all begin to self-upvote(even if it is good content) then we won't be able to form a web of interconnected posts, as there will only be parallel posts, which in a social platform has no social meaning.

Its score had a decrease in vote, I think it's because of my low voting power, I don't contribute anything to such a publication.

Not because of your voting power.

The post payout also fluctuates on account of fluctuating STEEM price.

In general, when you go on voting posts in trending page in increasing order of their payout(say $10, $50, $100, $200, and even more), the upvote value also increases as compared to your isolated upvote value(refer to your upvote value in Steemworld.org). Thanks to convergent linear reward.

The cumulative SP of all the users voting a post will be more than the sum of the isolated upvote value of the voters.

Since your upvote value is more you also stand to gain more curation reward. The position of your voting might affect(as you will vote such posts mostly after a whale's vote), but you still gain better curation reward as compared to isolated voting.

That is the reason why the top trending posts further get follow-through voting. Curators are motivated by the convergent linear to vote such posts.

Thank you.


Homework Task -6 successfully accomplished.
[5]

20.03.2021 10:21
0