MicroExpressions: Reading of the mind !! First Episode - How to Identify False ...


1518341464964.jpg

First of all, let's look at some of the newly-married couple's dinner table - 

Swamiji: I am the happiest person in the world. 

Wife me 

Husband: Well, ask a question, do not you mind? 

Wife (sitting a little bit), of course. (Take the glass of water) 

Husband (hesitated) before you was a person named Jamal? 

Wife: Jamal! No Jamal? 

Swamishri used to work with you ... 

1 /

... wife, whom have you heard from whom?(The glass of water is still caught in the face) 

Husband (hot voice) means that you had a son named Jamal? 

Wife (yes, having a little eyes closed, one drinks a little water) Yes, there was. But why are you angry?

Husband: That's my case. If you had lied about this before! 

Wife! (Softly) I'm telling the truth, believe me, and I only had a cologne. 

The husband remained quiet for a while. 

Wife: (looking outside the window) You do not trust me, right? 

The husband is silent now His fingers danced in the table. 

Wife (turning away from the window) but you know me well! I know very well that you do not understand me wrong. Do not exclude them. Well ... did you tell me about Jamal's wife? 

Husband: (dancing off the finger, do not touch the frown), why? 

Wife (smilingly) Hey lady is very beautiful, on the other hand that strange nature ............ 

2 /

wife: (uncomfortably), there was no one named Jamal in our office.

Husband or so ?? But I heard that ... 

wife (keeping down the glass of water from your hands) why do not you ask me without checking it or hearing it? 

Husband, why are you angry? I just asked! 

Wife (someone with a sharp voice) should not be there, what do you have? 

Husband: Look, you are angry but say ... 

wife: (crying voice) I know what I say. I do not want to talk about this (shaking shoulder). And I will not sleep with you today. 

3 /

Wife (Sharp) Yes, there was. Why are you suddenly asking her? (Water glass catching in front of the face) 

Husband, not so Well, did he often come to your house? 

Wife means Why can he come to our home in the Khamokha? 

Hey, are you angry?

Wife: Yes, I'm angry. (One kiss ends the water) Tell me why do you ask me this? 

Husband: Look, you're angry, but say you're sensitive about it. 

Wife (threw a glass) Yes, I'm a sensitivist.Do you have any problems Now tell me, the girl named Mira, why did she meet you sometime? 

Husband means? What are you saying 

Wife (standing up) is telling me right.Answer. 

4 /

Wife: Yes, there was. It's a long way, does not make it, is that guy? (By the glass hand hold) from whom can you hear? 

Husband: This is what I heard. 

There is no communication for about six-seven months in the wife. I went to their house quite a long time ago. House at Banani But you know? (Slowly the glass dropped down to the table, no water was eaten.)

Swamy did some work together sometime.Today is seen on the street in the streets. 

What did the wife say? (Again take the glass, play the water.) 

Husband: This is nothing ... nothing. Asked about you. 

Wife: The man's temperament was not good. Often the office could be heard in his name. I used to vie for my back. If you think the mood is bad! (For a while, shutting the glass on the table, kept the glass in the table) 

Where is my husband? 

Wife: You need it! You know more people!Well, have you seen in Banani? 

-------------------------------------------------- --------------------- 

Microxpressation It is the process through which people have different ideas about their attitude. Those who read the Detective books, they are very familiar with this matter. Although we have heard of such an analysis, Sherlock Holmes, Feluda, comes to mind, in practical terms but its expansion is far more! This microphone is a very important section of psychology. There is no pairing to find out the truth from the criminal. 

On top I wrote about four sequences between a husband and wife. Here the question has been asked mainly to find out if there is any involvement with the wife, along with someone named Jamal, her husband. Is there any lie in these four?Which is what? Try to guess before reading the rest of the text.

The method of detecting falsehood, or whether the accused is really guilty, can be divided into 5 sections. Those are: 

1 Body language: => The person who is lying, will not normally speak in the eye, ie I will not be like that. However, he will take away his eyes on the main part of falsehood, or at the moment he will throw his eyes. Chances are eighty times that he has closed his eyes for more than the other times to remove this glow

=> Physical expression will be noticeable, no organs of the body will move too much.If the hands and feet are spread out, then they will draw closer. If you do not have a habit of handing over your hair often and when doing so, it is more likely to be false.If someone does not have the habit of folding their hands, then talking about something special, if you fold your hand, it is almost 80 percent chance that it is false. 

=> Would like to answer in simple words, to make matters less trivial, or to put a hand on their hands. 

2. Emotional State Changes:=> There will be time discrepancy between expression and speech, after speaking in general, its expression will appear. For example, 'I am angry with you now ...' a little break, then a sign of anger, it means that the word is more likely to be false. And this keyword will not last long. 

=> There will be incompatibilities between words and expressions. For example, holding your hand or keeping your legs tight or dancing to your feet, say, 'I love you'. Or emotionally, soft-spoken, 'honestly, I can do this thing, no matter how hard'.

=> Extra type expression will change. For example, suddenly going to get angry, to cry, or to laugh, to eat a lot of choking, to crying crying crying. Note that if the expression is not changed, or if a specific expression is permanent for some time, then the ninety percent of the probability is innocent, that is, he is telling the truth. 

=> In the beginning, there will be more rage in the beginning, or they will remain vulnerable. However, the possibility of being innocent is more likely to be pronounced when the person becomes angry. And the innocent person will never be unfit or easy because of the allegations, the possibility of being angry is at least nine. 

3. Speech expression=> Repeating the answer of the liar questioner will repeat the answer. For example, 'Did you take a thousand rupees?' 'No, I did not have one thousand rupees' The issue of this Replacement is very important, in most cases it is false. But just saying 'no' does not mean that it is true. 

=> 'I do not want to talk any more about this,' or 'I do not want to argue about this,' If you talk to me about this, I will suffer so much ', the reason for such an endeavor is that the accused is wavering Feel In this case, the probability of lying is more.

=> It is usually tried to prove yourself to others, in which case, other than the questioner, if the media does this, then the possibility of lying to be about eighty percent. For example, 'you betrayed me?''You know very well that I can not do it, nobody knows me better than you,' That is more likely to be a lie. And ask Rafiq / Shafiq / Rahim / Karim, and I know very well that I can never do such a thing, that kind of thing is quite false.

=> False people generally can not tolerate the questioner's silence, until the decision is reached, he has tried to know how much the questioner knows about the complaint in different ways, or has given information about the complaint itself. While providing this information, he never contacts I, body movement is very limited. In spite of being quiet for some reason, the unrest could be clearly seen. 

=> Trying to answer the question, usually a specific question has to be asked several times a day. For example, 'Do you know the place?' 'I have never been to go, how can I?''Do not you know that?' 'I had a friend who did not even go to his house. The question does not arise.

=> 'Do not you believe me?' 'Can I lie with you?' If you use words like 'I am not expecting it from you,' etc., then it is more likely to lie. 

=> 'Where did you hear from?' 'Who said?'If there is a kind of question, and if such questions are repealed, the thumb impression is being accused of lies. Besides, he repeats the allegation as his own, so that it seems unlikely. For example, 'you mean I betrayed you?' I am Whom you knew for six years? '

=> 'I do not want you to think that ...,' 'I am not asking you to hurt' ', if the suggestion of the beginning of the word, it is definitely meant for that particular matter. For example, if the questioner asks the two with the above sentence, the questioner should think that particular matter, or hurt his word, so that the accused can prove himself innocent. 

4. Mutual interaction => The liar can not answer the question itself, but the same questioner will have the right to question the same, and he will not do anything, and the kind of encounter can not do anything.For example, two friends are saying, 'Have you ever taken drugs?' 'No, I have never been in a drug'. The second friend kept silent. Around 100 percent of the probability the second friend is lying. In fact, he must have asked his friend the same question.

=> The liar usually speaks of an incident that proves to be innocent, whose character does not know the character. And accuse some of those characters on similar charges. For example, 'know the smile of Mirpur? He used to do these business before, my two eye poison ... ' 

=> Interesting than trying to complain, intersting tried to attract the attention of the questioner. And if it is a small matter of complaint, then the probability of being convicted is 100%. For example, 'you have not seen the money bundles?' 'Hey brother, how will I see this bundle of money? On that day, the boss gave me a bundle of money, what was the situation with them ... ' 

5 Psychological profile=> There is no similarity between the number of information given by the accused, the numbers. And spend some time accused of finding out this match. 

=> Instead of taking the complaint seriously, instead of taking it seriously, it will try to laugh, but it will generally be noticeably weak.

=> Glass, tea cup, pillow, book etc. in front of the accused are very important. All its interactions should be carefully tracked.When lying in his hand, if there is any of them, he will keep it between them, if the tea cup is in hand, then leave it on the table without having to sip. If he gets tea after drinking tea again and starts to eat after a while, then the probability of his liar is eighty-five. Or if you put a cup or two cups of glass in it, it means that the words are more likely to lie. But if the accused does not take down the cup / glass or ate all, then he is telling the truth. But in this case, a very easy task can be done, if you complain about drinking during the meal, Or the possibility of leaving the cup / glass immediately will be 100%. The questioner and the accused have tea, cigarettes, etc. in all the interactions of the world. It is very important for criminal psychology. Howard Taten, a famous interrogator, used to judge the accused by looking at the type of eating.

=> The accused's view is very important. If he is confident about his words, then the person will be more mindful about his presentation than to explain the questioner, if he lied, then the questioner would have to understand his meditation-knowledge. 

=> If one of the accused is proved to be false, then he is fairly sure that he has lied many more lies, and there is a possibility of his lies being false. 

This is basically some basic method of detecting lies. The top classification was originally done by David H. Lieberman, and one of the leading expressions of facial expressions, is called Paul Ackman.

But remember, the most important thing is not to monitor microphones; They come up with a convincing decision and put them in a convincing manner and come to a convincing position. This work is the most difficult. Let's say a simple example: According to the above theory, someone says, 'honestly I did not do the job,' then he is a liar. But remember, this is the biggest mistake to think in this way. This saying is meant to increase one point towards the negatives of the accused, nothing more. It is not meant to be left lying in the cup without giving it a chance to leave it. You have to take it for granted that there is a chance to lie, or the probability of being a liar is heavy. So, in conjunction with positive-negative, many decisions should be made only after conclusions. It is necessary to remember that in some cases the decision can not be reached from a small matter. If you have a 4 and a 2 in front of them, multiplication, division, If you do not add or subtract, you will get the result. And in these cases there should be enough practice; Because in most cases it appears that the accused acts on the same contracts as well, which makes it difficult to reach conclusions. And it is a very bad crime to make innocent people guilty of psychoanalysis! But just thinking about the track, if practiced roughly, the chances of getting it wrong are greatly reduced.

Psychology is my favorite subject, and expressions are very dear. So there is a desire to write some more episodes. And these things can be best known about Fox TV's popular serial Lie to Me . The beginning of my interest is mainly from there.


Comments 1